Photography: Viewing the Unseen
Reviewed by Kimberley Anne
Garcia
The
Perfect Medium: Photography and the Occult
Metropolitan Museum of Art
September 27, 2005- December 31,
2005
It is
human nature to believe, often in the unbelievable. The photography exhibit, The Perfect
Medium: Photography and the Occult at the Metropolitan Museum of Art
presents a wealth of information on photography’s early role in the human
examination of the paranormal. Evident
throughout human existence is our predisposition to the allure of the unseen, a
fascination and attraction for the ethereal present even today. This
retrospective glimpse elicits ironic amusement from today’s viewers. Certainly there is humor in the primitive
cozenage of photographs like those of
‘Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Fairies’ but modern viewers of this dynamic
exhibit are left to contemplate the possibility of our own “Cottingley
fairies affair” of the present or even the future.
The Met’s exhibit, running from September 27 through December
31, 2005, is a smaller version of the exhibit presented in the Maison Européenne de la Photographie, Paris in 2004, the first of its kind to
assimilate the diverse examples of Occult photography from North American and
European private and public archives. The entire French compilation of
photographs and historical information is included in the Met’s
catalogue of the exhibit The Perfect Medium: Photography and the Occult, available
for sale. The Met’s
exhibit includes 120 of these photographs and, though it spans a time period
through the 1960's, it focuses primarily on the period from the 1860s to WWII,
the time of Henry Houdini, mediums, and seances, and
the advent of photography as a consumer product. It was during this time, in the early years
of photography, that experimentation resulted in a variety of ‘tricks’ to
manipulate the final image. What better
medium to prove the existence of ghosts but
photography, a medium (unlike digital photography) that is still widely—and
mistakenly—held to provide ‘truthful’ representations of reality? The Perfect Medium presents both sides
of the issue—skeptics in the active paranormal debate also employed photography
for evidence to contradict the Spiritualist movement begun in the 1850s—while
objectively refraining from commenting on the displayed photographs’
genuineness, granting viewers an unbiased, though nevertheless entertaining
glimpse at the past’s and reflectively our own attraction to the allure of the
preternatural.
The
exhibit is divided into three sections.
The first involves photographs taken of spirits, emanations supposedly
not visible to the human eye, but rather captured and later revealed through
the development process. While retaining
its status of impartiality, the exhibit presents ‘scientific’ explanations
posited by skeptics of the time. These spirit photographs were possibly either
manipulated in the dark room or staged during photography, often to the same
amusing results for today’s viewers as evoked by the second and closely related
section of the exhibit. The second
section includes photographs documenting the practices of mediums and the
events of séances, capturing physical occurrences that an eyewitness would have
actually seen. Such documentation was of
importance to scientific studies at the time, but even now presents interesting
historical and social perspective, especially on some of the risque and peculiar manifestations of rather suspicious
‘ectoplasm.’ A more introspective source
for paranormal photography can be found in the third section, displaying an
increasingly modern mind-set.
Appropriately entitled “fluids” many of these photos make claim to
capturing the vital forces of artist through direct physical contact with the photographic
plate rather than with the use of a camera.
Potentially the most honest of the three, this section contends the
creations are the literal manifestations of the artist’s mind, yet the
preternatural possibilities of the exhibit’s photos remains an
earnest attractions throughout the exhibit.
These
spirit photographs were prevalent following periods of war, initially the
American Civil War, then the French war of 1870, with a later revival after the
First World War. Naturally, spirit
photographs were first commercially sold in the United States, the first know
photographer to do so, William H. Mumler. Several of his photos are on display
including one of the trance-induced manifestation of a
spiritual ‘double’ behind a young medium called “Master Herod.” Mumler’s own wife was a know for
her medium abilities, but it was Mumler who in 1869
was accused and later acquitted of fraud in a well-publicized trial.
Also
married to a medium–his second wife–Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has a interesting presence within the exhibit. Doyle asserted the authenticity of the
photographs created by Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths, who were just
sixteen and ten. The children produced
several photographs of fairies near their home in Cottingley,
Yorkshire, two of which are on display in the exhibit. One image was brought to the attention of the
author who at the time was researching fairies for a book he later
published. Frances Griffiths revealed
the truth after the death of Elsie Wright in 1981. She confessed the fairies in the photographs
were copies of illustrations, which they propped up with hat pins. Out of deference to Doyle, the two girls
never contradicted him, the controversy of the photos becoming known as the “Cottingley fairies affair.” While there is testimony that
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was the victim of ‘Lock Ness Monster’ photographic
deception, he proved his convictions from beyond the grave, himself a the subject of a spirit photograph also on display.
William
Hope, a spirit photographer accused of fraud and defended by Doyle, produced
several pictures, as early as a week after the death of Doyle, some with
Doyle’s spirit and others including “psychographs” or handwritten
messages. Many were taken in the presence
of Doyle’s widow and son, Denis Conan Doyle, who appears with the spirit of his
father in the exhibit’s photo. Doyle’s widow, believing her departed husband
could communicate with the living, employed the medium Minesta
(alias Grace Cooke), and just a few days after his funeral, Sir Arthur Conan
Doyle manifested himself through the medium.
The exhibit later explains how some psychographs were produced and used
during séances, yet does not comment on the reliability of these ‘mediums’ for
such communications, leaving the viewer to ponder the possibilities of motives
and means, or even the possibility of guileless paranormal activity. The
exhibit does, however, present the case of Édouard Isidore Buguet, a spirit
photographer convicted of fraud in 1875 after admitting that he created his photographs
using double exposures. Many of his
Spiritualist clients refused to believe his confession, though Buguet worked for a time as a “photographer conjurer,”
employing his previous charlatanic techniques purely for entertainment
purposes. Entertainment becomes a
prevalent element in connecting with the paranormal.
The
documentation of medium activities became the subject of scientific study and
consequently photographs as can be seen in the second part of the exhibit. A common phenomenon was the production of
ectoplasm issuing from parts of the medium.
While there is no photograph of Minesta
communicating with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, there is one of the medium Mary M.
(Mary Marshall) with ectoplasm displaying Doyle’s portrait. Mary M. was know for
ectoplasm bearing famous personalities, while medium Eva C. was no doubt famous
for bearing a bit more than just ectoplasm.
There are several photographs by Albert von Schrenck-Notzing,
a doctor and pioneer of psychotherapy, who studied mediumistic phenomena; one
of his subjects was Eva C. Among the
many photographs of Eva C., who conducted séances “al natural”, includes one of
a luminous apparition between her hands that was not mentioned in Schrenck-Notzing’s account of the séance. Schrenck-Notzing noted
the “absolutely unknown” quality through which a completely naked Eva C.
without a concealing sleeve to hide cloth produced a photograph with a
“Complete Ghost.” But its
easy to wonder with a medium like Eva C. what the real attraction was.
Eugene Thiébault’s
photograph of Henri Robin “and a Specter” show some of the obvious commercial
qualities of entertainment that Henri Robin as an illusionist could formulate
in his “phantasmagorical” theater on the boulevard du
Temple in Paris. With the introduction
of a new flexible gelatin silver bromide emulsion in the 1880s, amateur
photographers spoofed spirit photography for entertainment such as the ghost of
Bernadette Soubirous progressing across the
image. The final section of the exhibit
returns to a more earnest examination of the ‘unseen.’ Without the medium of the camera, fluidic
photography attempted to capture ‘vital fluids’ through direct contact with
sensitized photographic plates. These
experiments included “fluidic photographs of thought” which transmitted images
from the mind to the plate through physical contact. Begun in the 1860s, but prevalent at the turn
of the century with figures such as Hippolyte Baraduc and Louis Darget, these
attempts continued into the twentieth century and show the progression of our
cyclic attention the paranormal.
Based
originally on the 1770s notion of “universal fluid” and evolving into a truly
modernist view in reflection of human’s interior examinations, recording human
emanations reached its height in the youngest photographs on exhibit, the work
of Ted Serios in the 1960s. Jule Eisenbud, a psychiatrist examined Serios’s
“thoughtography” in which Serios
concentrated in the attempt to replicate onto Polaroid film images hidden from
him. Serios’s
success varied as can be seen in the photographs on display. The only explanation critics of Serios can attribute to his projections of ‘thought’ rely
on the “gismo” Serios attached to his camera, but
whether or not he used this to conceal images for projection onto film remains
a mystery.
Whenever
belief is threatened the necessity for it grows. In this new century as science and technology
encroach further into our daily lives, humans remain seduced by the promise of
glimpsing the yet-unknown. Just look at
the Sci-Fi battle between science and the unknown playing out on weekly
television; CSIs versus five new network shows
all vying to be the new X-Files. From real-life ghost and haunting
investigators, to a show actually entitled Supernatural, not to mention
a remake of the 1970's NightStalker, it
is clear human nature remains consistent or at least cyclic. It is no wonder then that in the
mid-nineteenth century—a time preceded by tremendous technological advancements
and a paradigm of scientific thought—that the Spiritualist movement began, and
people demanded a view into the netherworld.
But wherever there are believers, there are also skeptics. Did Sir Arthur Conan Doyle became
his own proof of the supernatural after his death? Is photography a reliable witness? These are questions contingent on what we
believe. The Met’s
exhibit is the Perfect Medium for such an examination.