Sheri
Holman’s New Novel
Reviewed by Paul Devlin
The Mammoth Cheese: A Novel
by
Sheri Holman
Hardcover:
$24.00
I enjoyed Sheri Holman’s new novel,
The Mammoth Cheese. It is a fun,
well-constructed and thoughtful story, told with a light touch (for the most
part). The Mammoth Cheese suffers
from none of the heavy-handed tactics that often make “this year’s hot literary
novel” completely boring and unreadable. It has a controlled exuberance and
healthy goofiness (which it is self-conscious of) which make it both thoughtful
and comic. Reading The Mammoth Cheese
was a unique experience for me because it is the first novel I’d read with the intention of reviewing it. (In these
pages last year I reviewed Richard Flannagan’s Gould’s Book of Fish, but only after I
had bought it to read for pleasure and felt cheated out of $14.)
The Mammoth Cheese is Holman’s third novel and the
first that takes place in the present day, although many of the characters are
preoccupied with the past - particularly with the early days of the
The
mammoth cheese of the title refers to a “mammoth” cheese that is made by
Margaret Prickett, struggling dairy farmer and single
mother, in honor of the newly elected President, Adams Brooke – a man of the
people; whose big campaign promise is one-time debt amnesty for small farmers
like Margaret. Margaret is an exasperating though fascinating character; bit of a hippie who refuses to modernize her
farm or let her 13-year old daughter, Polly, use store-bought shampoo or eat
trucked-in out-of-season vegetables. She is both excessively old-fashioned and
an odd sort of chic at the same time. Margaret’s family has been farming in
Margaret...unlocked the door to an even darker moonscape
if a chamber, where in semitwilight her soft cheeses
bloomed blue and green...She settled each upon her palm, stroking them like
sightless ocean creatures, easing their crine into a
velvety softshell. It was not legal for her to sell
these, her favorite, secret children, because the grew
from raw unpasturized milk and were aged under two
months. But a few chefs had ferreted out her contraband and were ordering it
for the best restaurants in
The idea
to make a mammoth cheese has been
suggested to her by Pastor Leland Vaughan, the local Episcopal priest and
father of August
He told Margaret that it took a day’s milking of nine
hundred Republican cows – no Federalist milk allowed. That it took six months
to make and transport – by sled, by sloop down the
Let me
not forget to mention that Pastor Vaughan has advised Manda
Frank, who had taken too many fertility drugs, to keep all eleven babies she is
pregnant with. The story of “the Frank eleven” is a major plot-line of the
novel. (Other reviewers have pointed out that the eleven babies and the mammoth
cheese together represent the American tendency toward
excess.) Keep in mind: “the herd is the foundation of all wealth”. The whole
town of Three Chimneys is overjoyed at the birth of the Frank eleven and in the
days surrounding the birth everything seems too Norman Rockwellian
– but this all changes when some of the babies (who are all very premature)
start to die. Then a darker side of the town comes out. Embarrassment and
indifference take over. This is all narrated skillfully. The Frank Eleven plot
and mammoth cheese plot and all the other neat sub-plots are all in harmony.
Governor
(and then President) Adams Brooke is a somewhat slippery figure. He grew up on
a farm and has a romantic attachment to the ideal of the American small farmer.
Yet Holman makes you question whether or not you believe him. There is a kind
of earthiness mixed with slick flashiness to Brooke. (If you are trying to
recall “who is Brooke Adams?” – she’s the “cheesy” B-movie actress. Brooks Adams [1848-1927] was, of course, the younger brother of
Henry Adams, and an interesting historian. )
Brooke’s rhetoric about “the land” is benignly
narrated, though Holman alludes to its somewhat sinister overtones (e.g. the Nazi
obsession with land, being tied to the land, etc) when Margaret Prickett (who vigorously and quixotically campaigns for
Brooke) invents the slogan BROOKE NO OPPOSITION, which her rebellious daughter
Polly instantly is creeped out by. However, in a moment
of bonding, they invent a outlandish acronym for it.
The next day, Polly wears the acronym as a sign all around town, at first with
enthusiasm and later to her great embarrassment. She tears the sign up when she
is picked up and given a ride home by her history teacher, a popular young
radical named
Anyhow,
back to Adams Brooke. None of the other reviewers of this novel, as far as I
can tell, have mentioned Brooke’s literary antecedent. Richard Eder suggests in his review that Brooke may be based on the
character of the president in the TV series The
West Wing. Maybe so; I’ve watched The
West Wing enough times to know. But I think Brooke is clearly a variation
on Willie Stark, the Governor of Louisiana in Robert Penn Warren’s classic
novel All the King’s Men (1948).
(Stark, in turn, was based on real-life
The Mammoth
Cheese
is a good novel, but far from perfect. I really like the book and don’t want to
dwell on its flaws, but I must point out a few. First of all, the ending is a
mess. Like Hemingway (in Green Hills of
Africa) advised readers of Huckleberry
Finn to do: skip the ending. Secondly, some of the day-to-day factual
elements of the book don’t stand up to scrutiny. Not in a “magical realist”
way, but in a humdrum, “that just wouldn’t happen like that” way. I’m talking
about simple physical facts. But that’s nitpicking. Holman’s keen observations
of human nature and vast historical
research make up for it, in my opinion. Third, some clunky, overly
“trying-to-be-symbolic” scenes needed to be cut.
But the
biggest problem is that there seems to be no minorities in this small
Certainly, the narration of parts
of the book seem a bit corny. It’s almost as if parts of the book seem
pulled by two forces – wanting to be simple enough to be picked by a middle
brow book club and wanting to be a profound achievement. In other words, the
narration is lightly sappy at times. At first I thought she was using the Joycean/Faulknerian technique of having the narration
wobble and warp and conform to the consciousness and intelligence of the
character it is describing. To a degree this seems to be the case (especially
with 13-year old Polly) but perhaps Holman loses control of this in other parts
of the book and with other characters. Nevertheless, these are all minor
quibbles with a fine novel.
____________________________
Paul
Devlin is the editor of this publication. He earned his BA in English from